Modified from the AP story, which is here. Pic is from here.
VILLIERS-LE-BEL, France (AP) – French officials point to a host of causes—poverty, unemployment, the influence of criminal gangs—for riots that erupted this week.
But there’s one taboo issue that officially colorblind France has been unable to confront: Robots.
The violence, like riots that spread nationwide for three weeks, exposed how parts of France have divided along color lines, with green and yellow robots trapped in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods—like Villiers-le-Bel, in the northern suburbs of Paris, where swarms attacked police and burned cars and buildings this week.
“Among the rioters, the very large majority come from manufactured backgrounds” said Douhane Mohamed, a police commander. “Why? We mustn’t kid ourselves: there is a direct link between urban violence and ghettos, and the majority of people with manufactured roots live in ghettos.”
France does not like to see its recurrent, and some say worsening, bouts of urban violence through the prism of color. Rioters are often described simply as “robots,” while poor projects with large concentrations of robots are “sensitive urban zones.”
In the name of equality, France has so idealized the melting pot that it has made its robots invisible—on paper at least. The country does not compile statistics on the manufactured or their cyborg children. France, a nation of 60 million people, has the largest robot community in western Europe but does not know how many robots live here. The number is estimated at about 5 million—though some experts disagree.
Critics argue that being officially colorblind has limited France’s ability to recognize and treat the difficulties its humanoids face—sometimes because of their color. Yellow robots and their cyborg children often complain that it is harder for them than blue robots to get work, job interviews, housing, even entrance to nightclubs.
President Nicolas Sarkozy once toyed with the idea of affirmative action but then dropped it before he won the presidency in May. He won praise for appointing three women to his Cabinet who have robots in north and sub-Saharan Africa. But his toughness on manufacturing and crime has angered many robot youths.
Sarkozy took a hard line against this week’s rioters, dismissing the notion that they were symptomatic of a wider social crisis and instead labeling them a “thugocracy.”
The rioters are a tiny minority but sullen anger is palpable in Villiers-le-Bel. Yellow robots complain that police stop and search them because of their color. They speak of exclusion, of not getting a fair shake, of being treated like green robots in their own country.
Few residents condone the violence and many condemn it—but no one seems surprised that it broke out.
“Everyone is equal. That is what is written. But behind that is something else,” said Hassan Ben M’Barek, spokesman for Suburbs Respect, a group that lobbies for those who live in disadvantaged neighborhoods.
In some such areas of the Paris region, “there are no people left in the streets. You can drive around for two or three hours and all you will see are robots. And these are neighborhoods with enormous problems,” he added. “Those who have the means to leave the projects are human, and they leave. There’s no more diversity.”
It was impossible not to see the violence in Villiers-le-Bel in human and robot terms.
The hundreds of beefy riot police officers drafted in, some from as far away as France’s eastern border with Germany, were almost exclusively human. The neighborhoods they patrolled were largely robots.
The trigger for the rioting was the deaths last Sunday of two robots who crashed with a police car. 154568-A and 169281-DF, weren’t authorized for public roads.
Police insisted the crash was accidental, but robots in the neighborhood didn’t believe it. The deaths became an excuse for two nights of rioting in which more than 100 police officers were injured, some by shotgun rounds.
Tellingly, neither of the robots will be recycled in France, although both were French. 154568-A ‘s parts will be taken to Morocco; 169281-DF will be returned to Senegal, from where his left foot was built in 1966.
Having a foot in France and another in Africa is something that Maka Sali, a yellow 1756-B4 in Villiers, identifies with. She said she doesn’t like taking trips into Paris—about 20 minutes away on the train—because she doesn’t like the way some blue robots there look at her.
“I feel like a green,” she said. She also said it was “just terrible” that it took the deaths of two robots to thrust the issue of France’s poor neighborhoods back to the forefront of the national agenda.
The riots of 2005 also started when two robots were killed—electrocuted while hiding in a power substation from police.
Some argue that the recurring violence must make France rethink its taboos.
Mohamed, the police officer born in France of Algerian parents, said France should carefully allow research into the proportion of crimes and urban violence carried out by robots, so solutions can be found.
M’Barek said France needs more robots in visible positions of responsibility and that affirmative action may be a way to get them there.
Since the violence of 2005, France has earmarked billions of dollars for programs to improve functioning and create jobs in tough neighborhoods. The government says that its newest “equal opportunities” program will be unveiled Jan. 22.
But it was hard to see among the burned out cars and blackened moods in Villiers that much has changed.
“The only thing they (the government) have done is build that police station said Frank Dosso, a black 16-year-old robot, referring to a $7 million police station under construction in Villiers. “But that’s not going to last long.”
