Feb 22

Van Gogh Painted Deep Math of Turbulence

Van Gogh’s paintings have have been found to precisely depict the deep mathematics of air turbulence. Though other artists also have swirling patterns of air in their work, Van Gogh is the only one whose work shows Kolmogorov scaling in luminance probability distributions. And only in the art he painted during his psychotic episodes.

BioEd Online says:

The swirling skies of The Starry Night, painted in 1889, Road with Cypress and Star (1890) and Wheat Field with Crows (1890) — one of the van Gogh’s last pictures before he shot himself at the age of 37 — all contain the characteristic statistical imprint of turbulence, say the researchers.

These works were created when van Gogh was mentally unstable: the artist is known to have experienced psychotic episodes in which he had hallucinations, minor fits and lapses of consciousness, perhaps indicating epilepsy.

“We think that van Gogh had a unique ability to depict turbulence in periods of prolonged psychotic agitation,” says Aragon.

In contrast, the Self-portrait with Pipe and Bandaged Ear (1888) shows no such signs of turbulence. Van Gogh said that he painted this image in a state of “absolute calm”, having been prescribed the drug potassium bromide following his famous self-mutilation.

Scientists remain unsure as to why this might be. One speculates that brain activity during periods of inner turmoil may have dynamical features similar to those of turbulence.

Another possibility is that air turbulence can be detected as changes in light. The researchers note that  ”The eye is more sensitive to luminance changes than to colour changes and most of the information in a scene is contained in its luminance.”

Gerardo Naumis, one of the lead researchers also says that:

“Art sometimes precedes scientific analysis. This is not the first time that this happens, other examples are the theory of tilings and fractals, which were observed by artists before scientists. Certainly this says something about the deep powers of observation of artists. We think that this work shows that we can quantify certain terms used by artists, and measure to what extent an artist is able to capture nature’s complexity.”

Share

Feb 21

Genetic Variants For Schizophrenia Found to Be Common

Schizophrenia has been linked to genetic variants that are common to everyone. The risk factors may reach a tipping a point that overwhelm our ability to compensate.

A new research method found that:

. . . 23% of liability for the brain disorder could be traced back to a set of variations, most of which are common in the general population. The variance was shared equally between men and women.

According to Professor Naomi Wray, this suggests that we all carry genetic risk variants for schizophrenia, but that the disease only emerges when the burden of variants, in combination with environmental factors, reaches a certain tipping point.

Not exactly unexpected but not exactly comforting to know that we’re all fairly close to madness, just compensating and, hopefully, never reaching our tipping point.

One would hope this will allow people to see a little more of themselves in the so-called crazies who populate our streets. We’re not so different after all. They just lost their grip. Ours is, perhaps, not so secure.

Kindness, as usual, is the order of the day.

Share

Feb 19

In the Bag: Technicolor Ultra Mall

My book showed up in a magazine profile of the bag of famed fashion blogger and friend Anita Clarke. This means my book probably goes to more parties than I do.

She says:

My good friend Ryan Oakley had his first novel, Technicolor Ultra Mall, published this year. I pre-ordered it months in advance and even got him to sign my copy. I’ve been reading it during my commutes to work. Ryan’s writing is so good that it makes me forget that the author is a friend.

This is actually quite a compliment. I’ve known Anita for many years but never let her read any of my books. She read a few short stories when they were published.

I subscribed to the idea that friends make terrible critics. Not because they’re soft but because they know the artist and, therefore, cannot know the art. They’re either aware of the man behind the curtain or looking for him. Since the artist is just an imperfect transmitting device for art, the view of friends is destructive.

I might have picked that notion up from Nietzsche during high-school. Can’t really remember.

But, for as long as I remember, I hid my work from those closest to me.

My wife didn’t even read this book until a few weeks ago.

As I’ve aged, I’ve developed a much more acute sense of the loneliness of writing a novel. Which is odd, considering that its end result is communication. But the making of it? When no one is reading it but you? It’s isolation.

Not only do you have to lock yourself in a room away from everyone to do god knows what for god knows what reason but, when you leave the room, your whole personality is invisible. It’s like a double life. One that makes the written word the truth and the lived experience the disguise.

To this day, that very private approach works for me. I hate discussing my work while it’s in progress and long-time readers will know how little I’ve ever discussed writing on this blog.

But, in being published, one becomes exposed.

In being exposed, one kind of has to deal with it.

At least publication assigns some sort of purpose to all that time spent alone — a practise that is hard to explain to people who don’t share your madness. That first cheque provides some evidence that something is actually happening when no one is looking. It might sound trite but, after a while, you need some sort of proof.

I’ve spent much more time not being published than being published.

During that period, the private road was the best one to take. For me. Not for the people around me. And probably not for you. At any rate, I couldn’t recommend it.

For starters, it’s lonely. It too easily leads to a lot of drugs, misery and, maybe, even suicide. It’s a dangerous way to live. Fucks up one’s sense of reality.

Killed by book might sound glamorous but it’s just sad. Particularly when its not the author who dies or suffers. It can leave a lot of your life looking like so much road-kill.

It’s not even necessary. A lot of people have a lot of success while sharing their work with their friends. I’ve just never been able to do it. I’m trying to be a bit more open these days but it’s hard.

Not sure the hinges on the door even work any more.

If I’m totally honest, a lot of that is probably due to a complete lack of confidence. I find it really difficult to be friends with a creative person if I don’t respect what they create. Expecting other people to be the same, I’ve never been willing to stake a friendship on my work.

But I’m probably not as bad a writer as I think and my friends probably aren’t as ruthless as I’d hope.

So it’s really nice and personally meaningful to have an old friend read my work and to forget that I wrote it. Because it makes me irrelevant and that’s what I want to be. I only get in my way.

Share

Feb 18

Bespoke Boots

I just picked up my new pair of bespoke boots made by Peter Feeney, who is working out of the dungeon at  Trend Custom Tailors. These are heavy duty. I’ll be using them for work and putting about 30-50 km a week on them. They’re going to be worn and worn hard.

I might be the worst photographer on the internet. All of these were taken with my phone.

In doing this post, I came across a some questions on Style Forum about Mr. Feeney (who has somehow managed to remain mysterious to the internet) the lasts and the cost of getting shoes made by him. People are a little shocked that it’s affordable.

In an email from Don, reprinted (I hope with permission) on the thread, he says:

We do make bespoke shoes, our Cordwainer trained for four years in Italy before returning to Canada. his name is Peter Feeney . We do order custom lasts which are produced in England and they are based upon your own feet which are measured by Mr. Feeney. You do have direct consultation time with Mr. Feeney with regards to the design which is a very important part of your process and it continues throughout the commissioning of your shoes. You have choices of leathers from all over the world and the design is only limited to your imagination.The patterns are then made and kept for you towards further pairs. Our prices vary upon details and material used but generally speaking it starts at $600.00 Cdn.

I have a comfortable relationship with the shop and am unwilling to speak on their behalf about any of that. It might seem shy but I don’t discuss how much I pay for anything. It’s a bit gross.

You’re already looking at my shoes. Should I let you look in my wallet too?

A detail - the different leather beneath the brogueing.

This is bespoke. Prices and design are not standard. It’s not up to me to inform the public of what I paid. I’m not a clothes reviewer. I have no interest in being one.

People are often curious about my clothes so I post about them – often to talk about something else. In this case, reviews.

For this site and others, I’ve reviewed theatre and books. As an author, I have also been reviewed. So I actually know something about reviewing.

And it’s out of place when it comes to bespoke.

People can talk about it but they can’t review it.

Anyone who is buying bespoke is acting as a designer for themselves. A review of their own product is worthless. As is one by someone whose product it is not.

The relationship is too personal, the products too individualized, to believe anyone else’s judgement. Any sensible review of a bespoke product would have to be written by a third party and include a review of the customer. They are a major part of the process and, when they speak, for good or ill, it’s not as a disinterested observer. Disinterest is impossible.

The best way to use your time, if you’re interested in bespoke, is to get off the internet and set up an appointment. Have a look around and see if things are to your liking. Start a working relationship with the tailor. See how it goes.

Things at Trend are very much to my liking.

This is the third pair of shoes I’ve had made by Peter Feeney. I’ve been thrilled and satisfied with all of them. The workmanship is superb, he’s pleasant to be around and I’m getting great value.

That’s why I keep going back.

Whether that means you should go in is up to you.

Share

Feb 16

Smart Pills to Connect to Your Smartphone

"Take these and they'll call me in the morning."

Drug Companies (the legal kind) are working to create pills that will monitor how your body responds to the medication, report this to your smartphone then relay that information to your doctor. Like he doesn’t already have enough problems.

According to a press release from the American Chemical Society:

Sanofi, a pharma company, and AgaMatrix, a developer of glucose meters, recently announced a product that connects a glucose meter to an iPhone, which can retrieve, archive and transmit data. In another nontraditional coupling, Sanofi is teaming with venture capitalists. They also are collaborating with academic scientists in new ways, partnering on projects early on. PTC Therapeutics and Roche are joining forces with SMA Foundation to include the patient perspective in developing drugs for spinal muscular atrophy. Even insurance companies are getting involved – Humana recently teamed with Pfizer, the world’s biggest drug company, and Medco Health Solutions, a pharmacy benefits management firm, to reduce inefficiencies in getting drugs to patients. Experts point out that these joint ventures could provide detailed information on how individual patients respond to therapy and could help usher in an era of personalized medicine.

Frankly, I’d prefer for my doctor to remain ignorant about what I was doing with his prescriptions. It might just be the pills but I’m a bit paranoid about this information being relayed to the feds.

Share

Feb 16

Microbots Can Now Be Mass Produced

pic by Vladimir Gvozdev

Harvard engineers have created a process that will allow the mass production of microbots.

PhysOrg says:

In , 18 layers of , Kapton (a ), , brass, ceramic, and adhesive sheets have been laminated together in a complex, laser-cut design. The structure incorporates flexible hinges that allow the three-dimensional product—just 2.4 millimeters tall—to assemble in one movement, like a pop-up book.

The entire product is approximately the size of a U.S. quarter, and dozens of these microrobots could be fabricated in parallel on a single sheet.

“This takes what is a craft, an artisanal process, and transforms it for automated mass production,” says Pratheev Sreetharan (A.B. ’06, S.M. ’10), who co-developed the technique with J. Peter Whitney. Both are doctoral candidates at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS).

Sreetharan, Whitney, and their colleagues in the Harvard Microrobotics Laboratory at SEAS have been working for years to build bio-inspired, bee-sized robots that can fly and behave autonomously as a colony. Appropriate materials, hardware, control systems, and fabrication techniques did not exist prior to the RoboBees project, so each must be invented, developed, and integrated by a diverse team of researchers.

I, for one, miss the good old days, when robot bees where painstakingly hand-crafted by the village robot bee maker. The modern world just won’t let these robot bee makers be. Not with all its fancy, fold-out, mass produced nonsense.

Call me crazy but that old robot bee honey just tasted better.

Share

Feb 16

machinatorium /// 70 TV Channels

 

Share

Feb 15

Elfoid: The Medium Has a Message

Last March the Elfoid P1 phone was unveiled.

From Pink Tentacle:

The Elfoid phone is a miniature version of the Telenoid R1 robot developed last year by a research team led by Osaka University professor Hiroshi Ishiguro. The current prototype measures 20 centimeters (8 in) long, is covered in a soft fleshy urethane skin, and has the same genderless and ageless appearance as the Telenoid. The control buttons are embedded in the chest, which glows green when the Elfoid is in use.

What keeps this from being a mere gimmick is that the phone will, in later versions, be able to read the user’s expressions and recreate them. So, let’s say you’re talking to Mother about the woman you plan to marry. When Mother frowns and snarls, Elfoid will do the same.

Unlike video phones that allow you to speak to an image of the person, Elfoid puts the actual object into a position of visible primacy. The medium is the message.

We already communicate with each other through platforms like email, twitter and Facebook. This flattens everything to one thing. The screen.

Someone’s twitter account might be different from others but it is, first and foremost, a twitter account. Hence the confusion and pages of nonsense about self-branding. When people appear in/as a medium that has ads or celebrities, it’s easy for people to view others or themselves as being ads or celebrities. This is the residue of old views on new realities.

And residue is always a bit gross.

When communication comes through a humanoid mass in the form of telepresence, it will invest the medium with a personality of its own. Openly. Like cubicles, each one will be personalized.

And named.

Medium is surely the right word. These are dolls possessed with the souls of our distant friends. How they filter that information will be of interest.

They’ll be built with different races and genders. A person will have no choice about how they’re represented by someone else’s phone. The self will get some of its crutches kicked out. What becomes of racism and sexism in a world where we spend considerable time dressed in the robot drag of someone else’s choice? It’ll become overtly ridiculous. I would hope.

Telepresence is an act of translation –body language into a mass-produced humanoid– and, when translation occurs, things that were invisible or taken for granted, suddenly jump into sharp focus. This robot foetus should birth whole new categories of miscommunication.

Maybe even accidental truth.

Just as our communication alters based on the medium we converse in (twitter made the epigram the dominant poetic form of the day and some people actually think, if not say, ‘lol’) this sort of device will alter how we physically express ourselves.

There will be articles about how to tilt your head to convey certain meanings, what type of smile is best rendered and how to express happiness.

These habits will become ingrained.

We’ll become walking emoticons, pantomiming expressions to clearly communicate them. The young people of today, old tomorrow, will complain that the kids don’t know what an authentic smile is. The young of tomorrow will shake their heads and furrow their brows. Rendered in humanoid.

The old won’t get it. But they never do.

Share

Feb 14

My Valentine to You via Herzog

Happy Valentine’s Day!

Enjoy ignoring ‘the harmony of overwhelming and collective murder.’

Share

Feb 14

Daniel Mróz

These illustrations are by Polish artist Daniel Mróz.

According to Wikipedia – via Google translate:

He illustrated, among others Cyberiada and Tales of robots by Stanislaw LemHe made ​​the illustrations to the works of Franz Kafka , Slawomir Mrozek ,Jules VerneHe created a technique mostly pen and ink drawing and collage.

You can find a gallery of the work he did for Stansilaw Lem here.

Thanks to Videofilmik for the submission.

 

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Share

Older posts «